Ex-aide of Penang state assembly speaker fails to get leave, to serve 30-month jail

17 Feb 2022 07:32pm
Palace of Justice, Putrajaya - Source: 123rf
Palace of Justice, Putrajaya - Source: 123rf
A
A
A

PUTRAJAYA - The former special aide of Penang state assembly speaker, Khor Khan Khai, has to serve 30 months in jail for outraging the modesty of a woman almost four years ago.

This was after he failed to obtain leave from the Court of Appeal to file an appeal against his conviction and jail sentence.

Khor, 43, must first obtain leave before he can be allowed to pursue his appeal in the Court of Appeal under Section 50 (2) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 as his case originated from the magistrate's court.

Court of Appeal three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Has Zanah Mehat, Datuk Nordin Hassan and Datuk Hashim Hamzah dismissed Khor's leave application today.

On Nov 23, 2020, the Bukit Mertajam Magistrate's Court found Khor guilty on a charge of outraging the modesty of the woman, then 31 years old, and sentenced him to 30 months jail.

Khor committed the offence at Level 3 of an office in Jalan Sungai Rambai, in the Central Seberang Prai district, Penang, at 11.15 pm on Aug 24, 2018.

He appealed to the High Court against his conviction and jail term but lost his appeal which was dismissed by the High Court in Butterworth, Penang on Dec 21, last year.

He then filed an application seeking leave to pursue his appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Related Articles:

In his leave application, Khor also sought a stay of execution of his jail sentence pending disposal of his appeal in the Court of Appeal.

Lawyer M. Athimulan who represented Khor urged the court to grant leave, saying that there were several legal questions that ought to be decided by the Court of Appeal.

Meanwhile, deputy public prosecutor Mohd Fairuz Johari appearing for the prosecution said the questions raised by the defence were not legal questions, adding that leave should not be granted.

Section 50 (2) of the Courts of Judicature Act states that an appeal against any decision of the High Court in respect of any criminal matter that was decided by a Magistrate's Court would be confined to only questions of law. - BERNAMA

More Like This