The weight of criminal accountability

WHEN a person in power faces the law, society often struggles to respond calmly. Emotions — anger, pity, loyalty and resentment — rush in. The case of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has stirred all these feelings. Some see a wrongdoer finally being held accountable. Others see a respected leader who may now spend the rest of his life in prison.

Many have labelled it as karma, kifarah, fate or a divine test. Yet, at the end of it all, it is about criminal accountability. It means that when someone breaks the law, the law must respond fairly and without bias. In theory, this principle is easy to defend, but when it involves a well-known, powerful, or once-admired figure, it becomes more difficult.

Najib once held the highest office in the country. Millions voted for him and many benefited from his policies. Recognising these human dimensions does not weaken the case for accountability; it strengthens it. Justice does not require denying a person’s humanity in order to uphold the law.

And, wrongdoers are punished for their actions, not their social standing. In Najib’s case, investigations, trials, evidence and appeals all led to the conclusion that crimes had been committed and punishments imposed.

Najib, however, still has the right to appeal, seek judicial review and petition for a royal pardon. These safeguards exist because justice must never be cruel or arbitrary. A strong legal system allows room for mercy without abandoning responsibility. Compassion and accountability are not opposites; they can co-exist.

A woman holds a hand fan bearing a photo of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and reading "Bossku" as supporters gather for his appeal hearing outside the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya on Jan 6. AFP FILE PIX

Society often errs when punishment is treated as a spectacle. Celebrating suffering, mocking or gloating over a fallen leader does not strengthen the rule of law. Criminal accountability exists to protect the public, prevent future wrongdoing and uphold trust in institutions.

Likewise, portraying convictions as karma, destiny or political persecution undermines confidence in the legal system. Accountability only works when it is fair and consistent.

Najib’s case challenges Malaysians to confront a difficult question: can we hold someone fully accountable while still recognising their humanity? A society that answers no risks becoming either cruel or permissive. A society that answers yes demonstrates confidence in its laws and compassion in its values.

This moment is not about rewriting history or simplifying complex realities. It is about a basic principle: leadership carries responsibility, power invites scrutiny, and wrongdoing has consequences.

Criminal accountability is not revenge; it is the price of public trust. If Malaysia wants stronger governance and institutions, it must face this challenge. Justice is rarely neat, but when applied fairly, firmly and humanely, it becomes the strongest foundation a nation can have.