GEG policy may result in RM346 million loss to GDP by 2040 - Oxford Economics

KUALA LUMPUR - The Generational Endgame (GEG) policy can potentially result in losses of up to RM346 million in gross domestic product (GDP) contributions by 2040, according to a study by research firm Oxford Economics.
The report revealed that the implementation of GEG could also lead to the loss of over 2,700 jobs in the formal economy and an additional RM1.2 billion in annual tax revenue leakage due to illicit trade by 2040.
Oxford Economics said the actual losses could be even greater as it does not account for the recent contributions of the vape industry since its legalisation in Malaysia.
"Oxford Economics’ study indicates that banning vaping could affect the potential tax contributions of the sector, which is estimated at RM1 billion per year,” the report said.
The study also revealed that the implementation of the GEG policy could lead to growth in the illegal tobacco and vape markets as Malaysia has one of the world’s biggest tobacco smuggling problems.
"An additional 1.2 billion illicit cigarettes could enter the market each year by 2030 if this step is implemented, in a scenario where consumers affected by GEG switch to illicit alternatives compared to if the GEG policy is not implemented,” it said.
Oxford Economics said that although the GEG policy is a bold idea, a detailed analysis is needed regarding potential risks, especially when there is uncertainty regarding policy enforcement and the complex trade-offs and benefits resulting from the implementation of the GEG policy.
"A thorough assessment should be made of the potential costs, benefits and risks that could arise,” it added. - BERNAMA
Download Sinar Daily application.Click Here!

![<div itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/VideoObject"><meta itemprop="name" content="[TOP NEWS PODCAST] Art vs Boundaries — Where Should the Line Be Drawn?"><meta itemprop="description" content="One viral clip and the internet is split. Bold expression or going too far? As universities tighten control, the spotlight is now on artistic freedom, censorship and where institutional boundaries should begin or end.<br /><br />In this conversation, Aswara Assistant Director Corporate Imee Nadia Abdul Hadi weighs in on improvisation in performance, defining “sensitivities” and whether fear of viral backlash is pushing students towards self-censorship.<br /><br />As people debate, bigger questions emerge are tighter rules protecting values or limiting expression? And should university theatre adopt stricter guidelines like film rating systems?<br /><br />Watch the full discussion now on Sinar Daily.<br /><br />#TopNews #Art #Theather #Aswara #SinarDaily"><meta itemprop="uploadDate" content="2026-05-06T07:31:31.000Z"><meta itemprop="thumbnailUrl" content="https://s1.dmcdn.net/v/ataGo1f-k_5whPcid/x120"><meta itemprop="duration" content="P2094S"><meta itemprop="embedUrl" content="https://geo.dailymotion.com/player/xlcbf.html?video=xa89lbm"><script src="https://geo.dailymotion.com/player/xlcbf.js" data-video="xa89lbm"></script></div>](/theme_sinarenglish/images/no-image.png)