Muhyiddin's sedition trial transferred to KL High Court
On Nov 4, Muhyiddin’s legal team formally requested that the trial be transferred from the Gua Musang Sessions Court to the Kota Bharu High Court.

KOTA BHARU - The Kota Bharu High Court today allowed an application by former Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin to transfer his sedition trial from the Gua Musang Sessions Court to the Kuala Lumpur High Court.
The decision, made by Judge Datuk Azmi Abdullah, involves a case where Muhyiddin is accused of making seditious remarks during the recent Nenggiri by-election campaign.
Muhyiddin’s lawyer, Amer Hamzah Arshad, explained that the application was based on several factors, including the complexity of legal issues and the exceptional challenges expected to arise, particularly concerning the constitutional validity of certain provisions in the Sedition Act 1948.
Amer Hamzah told Bernama that the former Prime Minister's case has garnered significant media attention, is of public interest, and warrants being heard in the High Court.
On Nov 4, Muhyiddin’s legal team formally requested that the trial be transferred from the Gua Musang Sessions Court to the Kota Bharu High Court.
Muhyiddin had previously pleaded not guilty at the Kota Bharu Sessions Court to charges of making seditious statements during the Nenggiri by-election campaign at Dewan Semai Bakti Felda Perasu between 10.30 pm and 11.50 pm on Aug 14.
The alleged remarks involved claims that he was not invited by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be sworn in as Prime Minister after the 15th General Election, despite reportedly having the support of 115 out of 222 members of parliament.
The charge, under Section 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act 1948, is punishable by a maximum fine of RM5,000, imprisonment of up to three years, or both, upon conviction. - BERNAMA
Download Sinar Daily application.Click Here!

![<div itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/VideoObject"><meta itemprop="name" content="[TOP NEWS PODCAST] Art vs Boundaries — Where Should the Line Be Drawn?"><meta itemprop="description" content="One viral clip and the internet is split. Bold expression or going too far? As universities tighten control, the spotlight is now on artistic freedom, censorship and where institutional boundaries should begin or end.<br /><br />In this conversation, Aswara Assistant Director Corporate Imee Nadia Abdul Hadi weighs in on improvisation in performance, defining “sensitivities” and whether fear of viral backlash is pushing students towards self-censorship.<br /><br />As people debate, bigger questions emerge are tighter rules protecting values or limiting expression? And should university theatre adopt stricter guidelines like film rating systems?<br /><br />Watch the full discussion now on Sinar Daily.<br /><br />#TopNews #Art #Theather #Aswara #SinarDaily"><meta itemprop="uploadDate" content="2026-05-06T07:31:31.000Z"><meta itemprop="thumbnailUrl" content="https://s1.dmcdn.net/v/ataGo1f-k_5whPcid/x120"><meta itemprop="duration" content="P2094S"><meta itemprop="embedUrl" content="https://geo.dailymotion.com/player/xlcbf.html?video=xa89lbm"><script src="https://geo.dailymotion.com/player/xlcbf.js" data-video="xa89lbm"></script></div>](/theme_sinarenglish/images/no-image.png)