Tennoji Zoo’s scrutiny grows as New Zealand's kiwi bird controversy resurfaces amid concerns over Malaysian elephants

SHAH ALAM - A past animal welfare controversy involving a kiwi bird at Tennoji Zoo in Japan has resurfaced, drawing renewed scrutiny to the facility as concerns grow over the conditions faced by three Malaysian elephants recently relocated there.

The situation has raised broader questions about oversight, habitat standards and international conservation practices.

The zoo had previously come under global attention in 2024 following criticism over the treatment of Jun, Japan’s only captive kiwi bird. The issue gained traction after a New Zealand tourist shared widely circulated footage showing the nocturnal animal kept in what was described as a bright and confined glass enclosure.

The video also showed visitors tapping on the enclosure and using flash photography, conditions considered highly stressful for a species adapted to dark and quiet environments.

Further concerns were raised over noise levels, as the enclosure was not soundproofed. Loud crowds, including children, could be heard in the footage, intensifying criticism over the bird’s welfare.

In response to the public outcry, Tennoji Zoo acknowledged to the media that the enclosure was not suitable for the endangered species. The zoo later sought guidance from the National Kiwi Hatchery to improve care standards and indicated it was considering a larger, more appropriate habitat, although no clear timeline was established.

The episode prompted calls from New Zealanders for stricter oversight when their national icon is housed abroad, reflecting broader concerns about the management of endangered wildlife in foreign institutions.

Calls for the return of three elephants, Dara, Amoi and Kelat, have continued to gain traction online as Malaysians express concern over their welfare and urge authorities to ensure their immediate return to Malaysia. - Photo: FACEBOOK

The kiwi bird controversy has resurfaced amid growing debate in Malaysia over the relocation of three elephants—Kelat, Dara and Amoi—to Tennoji Zoo in March this year.

The transfer, which involved a 20-year-old male and two female elephants aged 14 and nine respectively, has triggered protests and petitions from members of the public and conservation groups calling for their return.

Critics have raised concerns about the suitability of the zoo’s environment, particularly given claims that some enclosures are overly concrete, lack natural features and may not provide sufficient enrichment for highly intelligent and social animals such as elephants.

Climate differences have also emerged as a key issue. Having spent their entire lives in Malaysia’s tropical conditions, concerns have been raised about how the elephants will adapt to Japan’s seasonal climate, including colder temperatures that could affect their health and behaviour.

The resurfaced kiwi case has intensified these concerns, with some observers questioning whether lessons from past controversies have been adequately addressed.

Beyond individual cases, the situation has sparked wider debate about international wildlife transfers and conservation priorities.

Some critics argue that animals such as elephants should remain within their native ecosystems, pointing to facilities like Malaysia’s conservation centres, which are designed to provide care in familiar environmental conditions.

Others highlight the need for stronger global standards and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that zoos housing endangered species meet appropriate welfare requirements, regardless of location.