Balancing AI ambitions with public concerns: Analysts say mega projects must not overlook everyday realities
While analysts acknowledge the long-term economic potential of such investments, they also cautioned that public sentiment remains closely tied to day-to-day issues such as healthcare access, infrastructure shortcomings and rising living costs.
SHAH ALAM - Malaysia’s push to position itself as a regional artificial intelligence (AI) and digital infrastructure hub through large-scale data centres has sparked wider debate over whether economic ambitions are being balanced against the immediate concerns faced by ordinary Malaysians.
While analysts acknowledge the long-term economic potential of such investments, they also cautioned that public sentiment remains closely tied to day-to-day issues such as healthcare access, infrastructure shortcomings and rising living costs.
International Islamic University Malaysia political analyst Associate Professor Dr Syaza Shukri said the government’s approach appeared to be driven primarily by economic considerations.
“From a political perspective, the government’s main consideration is likely to drive economic growth through large-scale projects.
“However, any administration must balance long-term economic ambitions with the immediate concerns of the public, as public sentiment can ultimately determine political support or backlash,” she said in an interview with Sinar Daily.
Syaza noted that there is often an assumption that highly urbanised and developed states such as Selangor would naturally support major development projects.
However, she stressed that the reality on the ground is far more complex, as Selangor is a diverse state with many local concerns that are more immediate and directly felt by residents.
“This does not mean the government should abandon large-scale projects altogether, but such developments must be balanced with public needs and everyday realities faced by the people.
“When introducing mega projects, clear messaging is also important, especially during challenging economic conditions.
“Public confusion can arise when there appear to be conflicting signals, such as statements suggesting that large projects are not a priority while major initiatives continue to be announced.
“In the current economic climate, much of the debate also comes down to public perception and optics,” she added.
Syaza stressed that public acceptance of such developments would largely depend on whether ordinary Malaysians felt negatively affected by them. She noted that these projects are generally more acceptable as long as they are not funded at the expense of the public or disrupt people’s daily lives.
However, the issue becomes more sensitive when major development spending is compared with unresolved public concerns, such as inadequate hospital facilities.
“If public welfare and essential needs are properly addressed, there would likely be far less resistance towards such projects,” she said.
Political analyst Dr Oh Ei Sun said the government likely sees high-tech infrastructure projects as part of a broader strategy for economic transformation.
From a governance perspective, he said the administration appears to believe such projects can create qualitative improvements in the economy by generating higher-paying jobs, stimulating local economic activity and increasing government revenue that could later be channelled towards addressing infrastructure-related issues.
Oh also noted that political considerations may be contributing to the government’s continued focus on large-scale investment projects.
“Politically, this approach may also be seen as practical because many urban and suburban voters affected by these issues are equally, if not more, concerned about broader problems such as the slow pace of reforms or even perceived regression, in the political, legal and socioeconomic sectors under the Pakatan Harapan (PH)-led government.
“At the same time, many of these voters seem disillusioned about which political coalition is capable of resolving their livelihood concerns.
“Although Barisan Nasional (BN) previously oversaw extensive infrastructure development during its long period in power, many of those projects were associated with corruption and collusion, which remain deeply unpopular among these voters.
“Perikatan Nasional (PN), particularly Pas, is also not widely recognised for infrastructure development. As a result, many urban and suburban voters may feel they have limited alternatives beyond PH, despite ongoing dissatisfaction and criticism,” he told Sinar Daily.
He noted that the government may be relying on expectations of stronger economic growth and the prospect of higher-paying jobs in the future to maintain support among these groups.
However, he questioned whether this approach is sustainable, pointing out that data centres alone may not create enough long-term employment opportunities to support that expectation.
“While such projects can initially create a surge in construction activity, many data centres are highly automated and the limited amount of research and development being carried out locally may restrict broader talent development and job creation within Malaysia,” he said.
The debate follows the recent launch of a data centre in Petaling Jaya with an investment valued at RM2.8 billion.
The facility was designed to support AI systems, cloud computing and large-scale digital workloads . The project forms part of Malaysia’s broader ambition to position itself as a regional AI and digital infrastructure hub.
Authorities previously stated that Malaysia approved RM144.4 billion worth of data centre and cloud computing investments between 2021 and mid-2025, amid rising regional competition to attract AI-related infrastructure projects across Southeast Asia.
Download Sinar Daily application.Click Here!
