Khadam is not just about the mystical, it's about what happens when people run out of choices

The film's haunting power comes not from folklore, but from its portrayal of women, survival and the burden of carrying what was never theirs to bear.

SHARIFAH SHAHIRAH

Inside The SHAtterbox

SHARIFAH SHAHIRAH
13 Jun 2026 10:10pm
Economic uncertainty, rising cost of living, and shrinking household comfort all contribute to a sense that stability is no longer guaranteed, even when life continues as normal on the surface. - Canva
Economic uncertainty, rising cost of living, and shrinking household comfort all contribute to a sense that stability is no longer guaranteed, even when life continues as normal on the surface. - Canva

THERE is a moment in film Khadam where silence does not feel like absence, but pressure.

It sits in the room like something physical, unspoken yet impossible to ignore, especially when the person who carries it has no voice to begin with.

Melor is mute, injured and trapped in a life that offers very little room for resistance.

She is surrounded by family expectations, an abusive marriage and an inherited burden she did not choose, and yet the most unsettling part of her story is not the supernatural presence she carries, but how normal her isolation begins to feel.

At first glance, Khadam presents itself as folklore horror built around ‘saka’ , the inherited spirits passed down like a family curse. But as the story unfolds, it becomes harder to separate the supernatural from something far more familiar, which is the quiet experience of people who have no real space left to say no.

Because Melor’s decision is not framed as curiosity or belief. It is framed as the collapse of alternatives, where refusal no longer leads to safety, only to more harm.

There is a point in the film where belief stops being spiritual and starts becoming structural. It is no longer about faith in the unseen, but about what people reach for when everything visible has already failed them.

Social psychologist Dr Adnan Omar describes this not as irrational thinking, but as a predictable human response to uncertainty. When people lose control over their circumstances, the mind does not sit in emptiness, it searches for meaning, even if that meaning is uncomfortable, because explanation feels safer than ambiguity.

In that sense, belief becomes less about truth and more about survival, a way of holding onto something when everything else feels unstable. And Khadam understands this instinct without needing to spell it out.

What makes the film linger is how easily this emotional logic extends beyond its narrative.

In Malaysia, belief in unseen forces has long existed alongside modern systems, not only in rural folklore or private rituals, but in public imagination where power, success and influence are sometimes explained through narratives that sit outside what is visible or provable.

Stories surrounding saka and influence in politics, or public fascination with cases like Mona Fandey, continue to resurface not because people fully accept them as fact, but because they reflect a deeper discomfort with how power operates and how outcomes are often perceived as uneven or inaccessible through ordinary means.

The question, then, is not whether these beliefs are real, but why they remain emotionally persuasive enough to survive across generations.

Part of the answer lies outside mythology and inside material conditions.

When institutions feel distant or unresponsive, belief systems often expand to fill that gap, whether in politics, economics or daily survival. People who feel left behind by systems of protection or opportunity begin to search for alternative forms of control, even symbolic ones.

This becomes more visible in periods of pressure.

Economic uncertainty, rising cost of living, and shrinking household comfort all contribute to a sense that stability is no longer guaranteed, even when life continues as normal on the surface.

Economist Professor Emeritus Dr Barjoyai Bardai stressed that recent sentiment patterns have consistently shown that only a small portion of Malaysians describe themselves as financially comfortable, while a much larger group report that they are simply getting by.

That phrase carries a quiet weight, because it does not describe crisis, but endurance, a constant balancing of needs where nothing fully breaks, but nothing fully stabilises either.

In that kind of environment, even uncertainty feels heavier than it should. Planning becomes cautious, decisions become reactive, and long-term confidence begins to thin out.

This sense of fragility is not only domestic but also global.

Concerns raised by former Health Director-General Tan Sri Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah about prolonged geopolitical tensions in West Asia point to wider risks involving supply chains, inflation and food prices if instability continues.

The impact of such developments does not remain at the level of policy discussions, it eventually filters into household spending, everyday groceries, and the basic cost of staying afloat.

And when the world feels unstable in multiple directions at once, people do what they have always done under pressure, they look for something that feels certain, even if it is intangible.

Now showing in over 115 cinemas nationwide from 11 June, Khadam delivers a chilling horror story rooted in Malay cultural fears — an inherited burden that cannot be refused, loyalty pushed to its limits, and the devastating cost of embracing evil. - Photo Courtesy of Komet Productions and Red Communications.
Now showing in over 115 cinemas nationwide from 11 June, Khadam delivers a chilling horror story rooted in Malay cultural fears — an inherited burden that cannot be refused, loyalty pushed to its limits, and the devastating cost of embracing evil. - Photo Courtesy of Komet Productions and Red Communications.

This is where Melor’s story becomes quietly unsettling, because she is not written as someone who embraces belief out of conviction.

She is written as someone who reaches the edge of refusal, where resistance no longer protects her, and where every available option feels like it comes with a cost she cannot afford.

Her decision to continue the khadam is not empowerment. It is exhaustion in its final form, where even fear becomes secondary to survival.

Director Shamyl Othman has described the film as a reflection on responsibility, particularly the emotional weight carried by women within family systems where endurance is expected and silence is often mistaken for strength.

But what the film captures even more sharply is what that endurance looks like from the inside, where survival is not dramatic but incremental, shaped by small compromises that eventually become irreversible.

What stays with the viewer is not the presence of the supernatural, but the recognition of how easily people can be pushed into spaces where belief becomes the only remaining structure of control.

Khadam does not ask whether spirits exist, it asks what happens when human systems stop responding in time to prevent people from turning elsewhere.

And that is what makes it difficult to shake off. It is not a story about ghosts in the traditional sense, but about the quiet ways people try to regain control when control has already slipped away.

Because sometimes belief is not faith. It is what remains when everything else no longer holds.

Download Sinar Daily application.Click Here!

More Like This