Allegations, Denials and a Police Report: Johor’s Latest Political Flashpoint

Dispute between Datuk Onn Hafiz and Datuk Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi raises questions over interpretation of constitutional procedures and royal assent.

TASNIM LOKMAN
25 Jun 2026 12:40pm
Dispute between Datuk Onn Hafiz and Datuk Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi raises questions over interpretation of constitutional procedures and royal assent. File photo.
Dispute between Datuk Onn Hafiz and Datuk Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi raises questions over interpretation of constitutional procedures and royal assent. File photo.

SHAH ALAM – A police report is expected to be lodged in Johor following a sharp public exchange between Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi and veteran UMNO leader Datuk Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi, amid escalating allegations over the circumstances surrounding the dissolution of the state assembly.

The controversy erupted after Puad announced his immediate resignation from Umno, accompanied by a candid Facebook post in which he accused the Johor state leadership of having lost its independence. He also claimed it was effectively being “controlled” by the Johor Palace.

Puad’s departure came just a day after he hinted at a “major announcement” ahead of the state election. He alleged that during a meeting at the Menteri Besar’s official residence in Saujana last Sunday, Onn Hafiz had told him that the Palace had “ordered” the dissolution of the Johor State Assembly on June 1.

He further describing the state leadership as a “bound puppet” and insisting he was compelled to speak out over what he described as political wrongdoing.

Onn Hafiz has since issued a statement to “set the record straight,” firmly denying the allegation.

“I categorically deny the claim made by Datuk Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi that I ever informed him that the Palace had ‘ordered’ the dissolution of the Johor State Assembly,” he said.

The Menteri Besar clarified that the dissolution followed a constitutional process, carried out only after receiving royal assent from the Regent of Johor, in accordance with Clause 23, Part Two of the Johor State Constitution 1895.

“The Menteri Besar cannot dissolve the Johor State Assembly on a whim. The dissolution must go through the process stipulated by the Johor State Constitution and only comes into effect after receiving royal assent,” he added.

Onn Hafiz stressed that proper protocol was followed, including seeking audience and presenting the matter for approval, and argued that royal assent is a constitutional requirement rather than evidence of political instruction or interference.

He also warned against framing constitutional procedures in a way that suggests interference by the Royal Institution, describing such interpretations as “highly irresponsible.” While acknowledging Puad’s right to leave the party and express differing views, he cautioned that the specific claims raised carry serious implications.

“Such statements are extremely serious and have the potential to touch on 3R (Race, Religion, Royalty) sensitivities, specifically concerning the Royal Institution, besides potentially affecting harmony and public order,” he said.

Confirming that the matter would be pursued through official channels, Onn Hafiz said Johor UMNO will be lodging a police report to allow authorities to investigate the allegations.

He urged all parties to remain calm and respectful, and to avoid drawing the monarchy into political disputes.

 

 

Download Sinar Daily application.Click Here!

More Like This